Renowned lawyer Isaac Ssemakadde recently found himself under fire as Ugandans voiced their concerns over his criticisms of Attorney General Kiryowa Kiwanuka’s involvement with the Uganda Law Society (ULS).

The debate erupted after Ssemakadde questioned the legitimacy of AG Kiryowa’s participation in the ULS, citing conflicts of interest given his role as Attorney General and alleged ties to a private law firm.

However, many Ugandans have challenged Ssemakadde’s stance, arguing that his claims are unfounded and rooted in a misunderstanding of the legal framework governing the ULS.

The Uganda Law Society, established by an Act of Parliament, operates under a legal mandate that includes the automatic inclusion of the Attorney General in its affairs.

Critics of Ssemakadde’s arguments emphasized that the participation of the Attorney General is not voluntary but a legal obligation.

The role of the Attorney General in the ULS is conscripted under the law, designed to ensure the integration of government legal expertise in the society’s activities.

Dismissing the relevance of this legal provision based on colonial origins, as Ssemakadde suggested, has been met with widespread criticism.

Observers noted that while the law may have colonial roots, it remains the foundational statute for the existence and operation of the ULS and its council.

Additionally, many have defended AG Kiryowa’s current standing, noting that he took a leave of absence from his private law firm upon assuming the role of Attorney General.

This step, they argue, eliminates any potential conflict of interest. Legal experts have clarified that there is no requirement in Ugandan law for AG Kiryowa to dissolve his partnership or resign entirely from his private practice. Rather, his leave of absence is deemed sufficient under existing regulations.

LINK: https://x.com/SSssebunya/status/1854838446252036487

As the debate continues, it is clear that Ssemakadde’s remarks have sparked a broader discussion about the role of the Attorney General within the ULS and the interpretation of colonial-era laws.

For many, the controversy calls for a need for a deeper understanding of the legal structures in place. Despite the criticisms, Kiryowa’s membership in the ULS remains legally justified, as he adheres to the statutory obligations outlined in Ugandan law.