• Sports

    Where Chelsea’s Frontline Press Falls Short: An In-Depth Analysis

    fig_admin Posted on

    Carl Recine/GettyImages

    In recent matches, Chelsea’s pressing game has shown weaknesses, particularly with the intensity and timing at the frontline. This aspect is crucial, as a well-organized front press keeps the team compact, reducing the opponent’s chances to exploit spaces and launch quick counterattacks.

    Chelsea’s offensive prowess is undeniable, thanks to the dynamic duo of Cole Palmer and Nicolas Jackson. Their remarkable on-ball abilities have been a consistent goal-scoring threat under Enzo Maresca, driving the team forward. However, if the club truly aspires to achieve their top four finish target and eventually challenge for the title, they must refine their out-of-possession approach, starting with the frontline press.

    In both high and mid-block situations, Jackson and Palmer have been integral to Chelsea’s pressing setup. As was seen under Mauricio Pochettino last season and now under Maresca, these two often lead the 4-4-2 mid-block structure, applying pressure high up the field. However, an analysis of their pressing during last weekend’s game against Manchester United reveals that their execution often falls short, allowing the Reds to bypass the press with relative ease.

    For any frontline pressing to succeed, attackers must approach opponents at the correct angle and with the right level of intensity. Incorrect positioning opens passing lanes that allow the opposition to retain control, while insufficient intensity enables them to exploit a simple combination or bypass the press entirely. In one instance, as a pass was played back from Diogo Dalot to Matthijs de Ligt, Chelsea attempted a man-to-man press. While Jackson correctly anticipated the pass, his delayed reaction allowed Lisandro Martínez to receive the ball and initiate a quick third-man combination.

    Though Malo Gusto and Moisés Caicedo could have helped contain the situation, the primary issue stemmed from Jackson’s hesitant approach. This incident highlights that, while Jackson and Palmer are effective attackers, consistency in their pressing actions remains a gap in Chelsea’s game.

    Interestingly, Jackson’s pressing can be highly effective when executed correctly. On occasion, he successfully blocked passing options, forcing André Onana into a long clearance that Chelsea easily reclaimed. But this effectiveness lacks consistency, as shown by another goal-kick situation in the same game.

    Here, Jackson aimed to curve his run to cut off a pass to Martínez, while Caicedo hesitated in choosing when to press Casemiro, leaving Onana with an ideal opportunity to bypass the press. Fortunately, Onana’s hesitation resulted in a turnover, but the episode reflects Chelsea’s broader pressing inconsistency.

    In high-energy games, it’s not sustainable for players to press relentlessly for ninety minutes. At times, Chelsea adopts a more passive press, but even when intensity decreases, awareness should remain high to maintain compactness and cut off central passing options. In one sequence, Dalot received the ball in the Reds’ half, where Pedro Neto applied moderate pressure. Dalot skillfully evaded the challenge, exposing Chelsea’s mid-block and leaving Casemiro free in the middle. Here, Jackson and especially Palmer had an opportunity to close down Casemiro but failed to react quickly, allowing Manchester United to exploit the space.

    Despite these issues, there are moments when Chelsea’s frontmen get it right. In one instance, Palmer read the play well, anticipating a back-pass and intercepting possession, which created an immediate chance for Chelsea. It’s clear that Jackson and Palmer have the potential to lead a well-coordinated press; the challenge lies in their consistency. Interestingly, in this scenario, Neto’s quick recovery down the left flank also illustrated his commitment to defensive responsibilities.

    An additional pressing concern is Chelsea’s mid-block structure. The wide gaps between players in their zonal-man marking system often make them vulnerable to basic movements that disrupt their shape. This setup can also cause problems when Chelsea transitions from zonal marking to a man-to-man press, a switch that opponents have exploited on occasion.

    Chelsea’s pressing deficiencies, while not glaring, are finer details that must be addressed in the coming weeks and months. While Maresca has implemented sound tactical principles, these small inconsistencies – particularly in the frontline press – require improvement. With better pressing consistency and positioning, Chelsea can make strides in their out-of-possession game, strengthening their push toward the top four and beyond. For now, the Blues’ frontline press remains a work in progress, an area worth watching as the season unfolds.

    LEAVE A RESPONSE

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    fig_admin
    View all posts

    You Might Also Like